Analisis Indeks Kelayakan Berjalan (Walkability Index) Pada Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Analisis Indeks Kelayakan Berjalan (Walkability Index) Pada Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v10i4.2282Keywords:
Walkability Index, Sidewalks, Pedestrian FacilitiesAbstract
Ryacudu Street in Sukarame District, Bandar Lampung City is the main route connecting the city center with the Trans Sumatra Toll Road. However, the design, provision of facilities, and maintenance of sidewalks along this road do not support optimal walking feasibility. Problems found include uneven sidewalk surfaces, discontinuous designs, many physical obstacles, and minimal supporting facilities. This study aims to analyze the Walkability Index on the Ryacudu Street sidewalk using nine parameters from the Global Walkability Index (GWI) approach. The results of the analysis show that the walkability value is in the range of 50–69, which is included in the “Waiting to Walk” category. This means that some pedestrian facilities can still be used, but are not optimal in terms of comfort, safety, security, and accessibility. Therefore, improvements are needed in the physical arrangement of sidewalks, provision of facilities, public space management policies, and enforcement of pedestrian space utilization regulations. This analysis provides strategic information on areas that need to be improved based on the value of each parameter analyzed.
References
Alam, N., & Yudono, A. (2019). Pengembangan Jalur Pejalan Kaki Kawasan Central Business District (CBD) Kota Makassar. Jurnal Wilayah Dan Kota Maritim, 7, 92711.
Althoff, T., Sosič, R., Hicks, J. L., King, A. C., Delp, S. L., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature, 547(7663), 336–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23018
Blumenberg, E., & Ehrenfeucht, R. (2008). Civil liberties and the regulation of public space: The case of sidewalks in Las Vegas. Environment and Planning A, 40(2), 303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a37429
Dharmawan, D. (2004). Mengamati Peran Pedestrian Dalam Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Studi Kasus: Daerah Sudirman-Thamrin Jakarta. NALARs, 3(1), 78. https://library.gunadarma.ac.id/journal/mengamati-peran-pedestrian-dalam-kehidupan-sosial-ekonomi-masyarakat-studi-kasus-daerah-sudirman-thamrin-jakarta
Endarwati, M. C., Setyawan, A., & Marison, O. (2018). Penilaian Walkability Score Index pada Pusat Pelayanan dalam Menuju Kota Malang Berkelanjutan (Assessment of Walkability Score Index at Services Center Towards Sustainable Malang City). Seminar Nasional Kota Berkelanjutan, 174–194. https://doi.org/10.25105/psnkb.v1i1.2898
Fasikhullisan, A. (2015). Redesain Zebra Cross Guna Meningkatkan Kenyamanan Penyeberang Jalan (Studi Kasus Simpang Bundaran Jalan Kartini Kota Tegal). Politeknik.
Fitriani, E. (2014) Evaluasi Pemenuhan Standar Trotoar Di Central Business District (Studi Kasus Kota Bandung) Evaluation Compliance Sidewalk Standards at Central Business District (Case Study: Bandung City). Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 26, 664–665. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331046700_Evaluasi_Pemenuhan_Standar_Trotoar_Di_Central_Business_District_Studi_Kasus_Kota_Bandung/fulltext/600fc6a392851c13fe39d5dd/Evaluasi-Pemenuhan-Standar-Trotoar-Di-Central-Business-District-Studi-Kasus-Kota-Bandung.pdf
Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 20(4), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/UDI.2015.22/TABLES/2
Fraser, S. D. S., & Lock, K. (2011). Cycling for transport and public health: A systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. In European Journal of Public Health (Vol. 21, Issue 6, pp. 738–743). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq145
Gota, S., Fabian, H. G., Mejia, A. A., & Punte, S. S. (2010). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities (6th ed., Vol. 17). Asian Development Bank. http://www.urbanindia.nic.in/programme/ut/final_Report.pdf
Iswanto, D. (2006). Pengaruh Elemen Elemen Pelengkap Jalur Pedestrian Terhadap Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki, Studi Kasus Penggal Jalan Pandanaran Dimulai dari Jalan Randusari Hingga Kawasan Tugu Muda. Enclosure, 5(1).
ITP Indonesia (Ed.). (2019). Panduan Desain Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki: DKI Jakarta 2017-2022. 2020. https://itdp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Panduan-Fasilitas-Pejalan-Kaki-di-Jakarta-v2.0.pdf
Krambeck, Holly., & Shah, Jitendra. (2006). The Global Walkability Index: Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Leather, J., Fabian, H., Sudhir Gota, & Alvin Mejia. (2011). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities State and Issues (6th ed.). Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1408
Marga, Bina (2018). Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki (SE Menteri PUPR No. 05/ P/ BM/ 2023).
Listianto, T. I. P. (2006). Hubungan Fungsi Dan Kenyamanan Jalur Pedestrian [Universitas Diponegoro]. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/15867/1/T._Indra_Pawaka_Listianto.pdf
Mantik, V. G., Timboeleng, J. A., & Jefferson, L. (2015). Perencanaan Kebutuhan Pedestrian Pada Ruas Jalan Suprapto Kota Manado. 13, 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35793/jts.v13i62.8190
Mauliani, L., Purwantiasning, A. W., & Aqli, W. (2013). Kajian Jalur Pedestrian Sebagai Ruang Terbuka Pada Area Kampus. Jurnal Arsitektur Nalars, 12(2), 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24853/nalars.12.2.%25p
Nurmansyah, H. A. (2019). Penggunaan Trotoar Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan. Jurist Diction, 2, 2162.
Permen PU. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor: 03/Prt/M/2014. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/128205/permen-pupr-no-03prtm2014-tahun-2014
Siregar, Z. (2020). Kajian Penataan Jalur Pedestarian Jalan Kapten Mukhtar Basri Medan Sebagai Akses Utama Kampus UMSU. Jurnal Mesil (Mesin, Elektro, Sipil,) (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Tanan, N., Wibowo, S. S., & Tinumbia, N. (2017). Pengukuran Walkability Index Pada Ruas Jalan Di Kawasan Perkotaan. Jurnal Jalan-Jembatan, 34(2), 115–127. https://binamarga.pu.go.id/jurnal/index.php/jurnaljalanjembatan/article/view/90
Tanuwidjaja, G., Yoana Nadia, & Michelle Laurencia. (2017). Desain Trotoar Yang Ramah Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Jl. Frontage Ahmad Yani Surabaya. Universitas Widya Kartika, 1(1), 2. https://ojs.widyakartika.ac.id/index.php/sniter/article/view/15
Ton, D., Duives, D. C., Cats, O., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2019). Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 123, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.023
Wang, Y., Chau, C. K., Ng, W. Y., & Leung, T. M. (2016). A review on the effects of physical built environment attributes on enhancing walking and cycling activity levels within residential neighborhoods. Cities, 50, 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004
Zaenal Muttaqin, M., & Khodizah, S. (2021). Walkability Index Pada Zona Komersial Melalui Segmentasi Area Trotoar di Kota Pekanbaru. Walkability Index for Commercial Zone Through Sidewalk Area Segmentation in Pekanbaru. 08 (02). https://journal.itltrisakti.ac.id/index.php/jmtranslog
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
