Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Literasi Media: Validitas dan Reliabilitas Menggunakan Model Rasch
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v10i2.2048Keywords:
Item response theory, media literacy, rasch modelAbstract
Indonesia, as one of the most populous countries in the world, presents a potential market for the growth of various types of social media. However, the rapid penetration of social media has not been matched by a good level of literacy among its users, leading to a tendency for social media use to have negative implications. The literacy instruments used to measure media literacy certainly need a quality analysis to ensure that the instruments developed can indeed measure what they intend to measure. Rasch Model instrument analysis can be a way to assess the quality of the developed instruments. This study is a developmental research aimed at developing a media literacy instrument. The analysis in this article is conducted to describe the quality of the media literacy instrument that has been developed. The subjects in this study are 421 response patterns to a set of questionnaire statements consisting of 25 items on a Likert scale with four alternative answers. Based on the research conducted, it was found that out of the 25 items tested, they have good validity and reliability. However, among the 25 statements tested, there are 4 statements that are considered less fit or less effective in measuring media literacy indicators. Out of 421 respondents, 17.58% of respondents have high literacy skills, 72.2% have moderate media literacy skills, and the remaining 10.2% have low media literacy.
References
Abidin, S. (2023). Tingkat Literasi Media Pelajar di Kota Batam . Jurnal Teknik Ibnu Sina (JT-IBSI), 8(01), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.36352/jt-ibsi.v8i01.614
Affandi, N., Ginting, R., & Saleh, A. (2023). Pengaruh Program Kabar Pandemi Corona tvOne Terhadap Peningkatan Literasi Media Masyarakat Kota Medan di Era Digital. Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30596/ji.v7i1.13147
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Routledge.
Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why,when,and how? CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148
Dame Adjin-Tettey, T. (2022). Combating fake news, disinformation, and misinformation: Experimental evidence for media literacy education. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2037229
Dewi, D. K., & Budiwati, Y. (2024). Instagram Sebagai Media Branding Institusi Untuk Mempersuasi Gen Z Dalam Memilih Pendidikan Tinggi. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 9(3), 581–589. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v9i3.1852
Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex Differences in Social Behavior. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781906
Hamzah, F. M., Rashid, M. N. A., Rahman, M. N. A., & Rasul, M. S. (2022). Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of Authentic Learning Instruments using RASCH Model. International Journal of Global Optimization and Its Application, 1(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.56225/ijgoia.v1i3.69
Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah. (2016). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Pengetahuan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif, dan Menyenangkan (PAKEM) Menggunakan Model Rasch. Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA, 16(2), 169–179.
Heiss, R., Nanz, A., & Matthes, J. (2023). Social media information literacy: Conceptualization and associations with information overload, news avoidance and conspiracy mentality. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107908
Hidayat, F. P., & Ginting, R. (2020). Media Literacy of Communication Students in Using Facebook. ETTISAL : Journal of Communication, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/ejoc.v5i1.3947
Hidayat, F. P., & Lubis, F. H. (2021). Literasi Media Dalam Menangkal Radikalisme Pada Siswa. Jurnal Interaksi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30596/interaksi.v5i1.5564
Indriani, N. N., & Krismayani, I. (2024). Kemampuan Literasi Media Mahasiswa Universitas Diponegoro Angkatan 2018 dalam Menggunakan Media Sosial Tiktok untuk Menghadapi Informasi Hoax. ANUVA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, Dan Informasi, 8(1).
Misbach, I. H., & Sumintono, B. (2014). Pengembangan dan validasi instrumen “Persepsi Siswa tehadap Karakter Moral Guru” di Indonesia dengan Model Rasch. Seminar Nasional Psikometri.
Mutmainnah, M. N., Rahmatia, R., & Hasbi, H. (2020). Literasi Media Sosial pada Pemuda di Desa Soro Kabupaten Bima. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 21(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v21i2.14894
Nafilah, N., & Pramudyo, G. N. (2024). Tingkat Literasi Media Mahasiswa Ilmu Perpustakaan Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 13(2).
Ni’mah, N., Fitri, A. N., & Fitri, F. (2022). Tingkat pengetahuan literasi media pada mahasantri di Pondok Pesantren Fadhul Fadhlan Semarang. Islamic Communication Journal, 7(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2022.7.1.9734
Nurhaipah, T., & Ramallah, Z. (2024). Literasi Media dalam Menangkal Informasi Hoaks Jelang Kontestasi Politik 2024. Indonesian Journal of Digital Public Relations (IJDPR), 2(2), 100–111. https://journals.telkomuniversity.ac.id/IJDPR
Pérez-Escoda, A., Pedrero-Esteban, L. M., Rubio-Romero, J., & Jiménez-Narros, C. (2021). Fake news reaching young people on social networks: Distrust challenging media literacy. Publications, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9020024
Rasi, P., Vuojärvi, H., & Rivinen, S. (2021). Promoting Media Literacy Among Older People: A Systematic Review. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713620923755
Sari, Y., & Prasetya, H. (2022). Literasi Media Digital pada Remaja di Tengah Pesatnya Perkembangan Media Sosial. Jurnal Dinamika Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1).
Scoulas, J. M., Aksu Dunya, B., & De Groote, S. L. (2021). Validating students’ library experience survey using rasch model. Library and Information Science Research, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101071
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial (Edisi Revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Penerbit Trim Komunikata.
Suryana, D., Putri, M. A., Supriatna, M., & Yudha, E. S. (2022). Analisis Rasch Model: Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Korban Bullying. Hisbah: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Dakwah Islam, 19(2).
Sya’diyah, K., & Anggraini, R. (2020). Pengaruh Literasi Media terhadap Perilaku Penyebaran Hoax di Kalangan Generasi Z. Komunida: Media Komunikasi Dan Dakwah, 10(02), 142–159.
Valle, N., Zhao, P., Freed, D., Gorton, K., Chapman, A. B., Shea, A. L., & Bazarova, N. N. (2024). Towards a Critical Framework of Social Media Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241247224
We Are Social, & Meltwater. (2023). Digital 2023 Global Overview Report: The Essential Guide to the World’s Connected Behaviours.
Wibisono, S. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Validasi Instrumen Pengukuran Fundamentalisme Agama Bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(3), 729–750.
Wiladi, G. J., & Afrianti, D. M. (2024). Pengaruh Literasi Media Digital Terhadap Tindakan Penyebaran Berita Palsu Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Bhayangkara. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(21).
Yudha, R. P. (2023). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Instrument: Validity and Reliability Analysis With The Rasch Model. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i1.9468
Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where It Has Been, Where It Is Now, and Where It Is Going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701375832
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Romdlon Maslahul Adi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
