Evaluasi Penjadwalan Pembangunan Pembangkit Listrik Terapung Dengan Menggunakan Metode Project Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v10i3.1918Keywords:
Evaluation, Planning, PERT, SchedulingAbstract
This research aims to optimize existing project schedule plans so that time can be used more effectively and efficiently. Through the method used, it is hoped that we can find out the sequence of methods that can provide optimal results for the needs of the production acceleration aspect in project schedule planning at PT X Indonesia. This research uses quantitative methods by processing data obtained from the company. The method that will be used in this analysis is the Project Evaluation Review Technique (PERT). After processing the data using the Project Evaluation Review Technique method, it can be seen that there are 6 critical jobs. From the calculation results obtained at Z = 3.55, the Z value on the normal distribution curve is 0.9998 so that the probability that the project can be completed in 213 days is 99.98%. This means the project can be completed 16 days faster than it should be, where initially the project could be completed in 229 days.
References
Abdurrasyid, A., Luqman, L., Haris, A., & Indrianto, I. (2019). Implementasi Metode PERT dan CPM pada Sistem Informasi Manajemen Proyek Pembangunan Kapal. Khazanah Informatika : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika, 5(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v5i1.7066
Adika Pratama, & Restu Hikmah Ayu Murti. (2023). Pengendalian Risiko pada Pekerjaan Block Assembly Proyek Barge Mounted Power Plant Menggunakan Job Hazard Analysis. INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 2(3), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v2i3.1895
Ardiansyah, Risnita, & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jurnal IHSAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57
Arsjad, T. T., & Malingkas, Y. G. (2020). Pengendalian Biaya Dan Waktu Pada Proyek Pembangunan Ruko Di Area Perumahan Kharisma Koka Minahasa Menggunakan Metode Konsep Nilai Hasil. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 8(1), 53–64.
Asyrofi, H. R., & Arumsari, P. (2023). Comparative analysis of CPM, PDM and PERT method on the duration of bridge work (Case study : Gelam Bridge Project). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1169(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1169/1/012011
Aulia, S., & Cipta, H. (2023). Network Planning Analysis Using CPM and PERT Methods on Optimization of Time and Cost. Sinkron, 8(1), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i1.11961
Diharjo, T. S., & Sumarman. (2019). Analisis Manajemen Konstruksi Pembangunan Ruko Grand Orchard Cirebon. Jurnal Konstruksi, 5(1), 65–81.
Fauza, M., & Kartika, N. (2020). ANALISIS PENGENDALIAN PROYEK MENGGUNAKAN KURVA-S DAN METODE EARNED VALUE PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN TROTOAR DI RUAS JALAN CISAAT KECAMATAN CISAAT KABUPATEN SUKABUMI. Jurnal Ilmiah SANTIKA, 10(1), 37–48.
Febriana, W., & Aziz, U. A. (2021). Analisis Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Metode PERT Menggunakan Microsoft Project 2016. Surya Beton : Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 5(1), 37–45. http://jurnal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/suryabeton
Firmansyah, M., Masrun, M., & Yudha S, I. D. K. (2021). Esensi Perbedaan Metode Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Elastisitas - Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i2.46
Harahap, K. H., MZ, H., Suryani, F., & Tamalika, T. (2022). Pengaruh Waktu Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pdm Dan Pert. Jurnal Desimasi Teknologi, 10, 84–95.
Harmawanto, J., Setianto Poernomo, Y. C., & Winarto, S. (2019). Analisa Anggaran Biaya Danpenjadwalanproyek Perbaikan Tanggul Kali Bakungdesa Cengkok Kecamatan Tarokan Kabupaten Kediri. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi & Teknik Sipil, 2(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.30737/jurmateks.v2i2.514
Lubis, A., Suhendar, E., & Suharmanto, P. (2021). Optimasi Penjadwalan Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Tol Becakayu Seksi 1Bc Dengan Menggunakan Metode Cpm Dan Pert. Sustainable Environmental and Optimizing Industry Journal, 3(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.36441/seoi.v3i2.461
Lubis, Y., & Suita, D. (2019). Simulasi Perbedaan Durasi Pelaksanaan Proyek Antara Metode Barchart Dengan Pdm Dan Pert. Buletin Utama Teknik, 15, 5–14. https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/but/article/view/1862
Maduagwu, E. N. (2022). Critical Path Method (Cpm) Network As A Tool For Effective Project Execution In Some Selected Construction Firms In Enugu State. European Journal of Marketing and Mangement Sciences, 5(2), 36–59. https://aspjournals.org/Journals/index.
Nkoi, B., Wordu, A. A., & Worgu, F. (2019). Project Evaluation Review Technique Model to Dredging Operations in Niger Delta. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 4(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2019.4.3.1115
Oktafiana, L. O., & Baroroh, I. (2022). Comparative Analysis of CPM, PDM and PERT Methods in Ship Repair Scheduling Planning KN. RB 309 Ternate 01. Berkala Sainstek, 10(3), 162. https://doi.org/10.19184/bst.v10i3.32479
Orumie Ukamaka, C. (2020). Implementation of Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM): A Comparative Study. International Journal of Industrial and Operations Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35840/2633-8947/6504
Pamadi, M., Hayadi Umar, U., & Chen, N. (2021). Analisis Penjadwalan Proyek Menggunakan Metode EVA (Earned Value Analysis) pada Proyek Pembangunan Ruko De Monde Junction-Pasir Putih, Batam. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 2(2), 188–202.
Ren, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Research on Software Project Schedule Planning Technology Based on the Integration of PERT and CPM. Procedia Computer Science, 228, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.029
Santoso, J. T., & Kom, M. (2023). Manajemen Proyek Teknologi Informasi (M. Sholikan (ed.); 1st ed.). Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.
Sulistia, D., & Agustina, I. D. (2023). Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Kurva-S Pada Pembangunan Perumahan Di Kota Bekasi. Jurnal Al Ulum LPPM Universitas Al Washliyah Medan, 11(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.47662/alulum.v11i2.540
Sunatha, I. G. N., Agung, A., Ritaka, R., Praganingrum, T. I., Loviani, P. M., Studi, P., Sipil, T., Teknik, F., & Mahasaraswati, U. (2023). EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT ( Studi Kasus : Pembangunan Gedung Dekanat Fakultas Kedokteran Udayana ). Jurnal Teknik Gradien, 15(02), 39–47.
Susila, I. M. D., Atmojo, Y. P., Rini, E. S., & Suradarma, I. B. (2021). Implementasi Teknologi Mobile untuk Pelaporan Kemajuan Kerja Proyek Jasa Konstruksi. Jurnal Sistem Dan Informatika (Jsi), 15(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30864/jsi.v15i2.349
Utomo, A. P., Nugroho, P. N. A., & ... (2022). Analisa Kekuatan Spud Sebagai Sistem Mooring Barge Mounted Power Plant 60 Mw Dengan Metode Elemen Hingga. … Nasional Terapan Riset …, 8(1), 591–598. https://proceeding.isas.or.id/index.php/sentrinov/article/view/1212%0Ahttps://proceeding.isas.or.id/index.php/sentrinov/article/download/1212/574
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
