Evaluasi Program Uji Tingkat Kompetensi (UTK) Departemen Otomotif SMKN 1 Blitar Menggunakan Model CIPPO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v9i3.1591Keywords:
UTK, SMK Competency Test, Industry Certification, CIPPOAbstract
Vocational education is a form of education that prepares students to be ready to enter the world of work in certain fields of work. Currently, the development of Vocational High Schools (SMK) as providers of formal vocational education programs refers to the Merdeka Curriculum, one of which is to improve the relationship between schools and the world of work through the concept of links and matches between schools and industries. Competency Level Test (UTK) is a vocational education development program in the form of learning and competency testing developed by the Automotive Department of SMKN 1 Blitar. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of UTK quantitatively with indicators of context, input, process, product, and outcome aspects. This research is an evaluation study through a descriptive quantitative approach and survey through the CIPPO model (context, input, process, product, outcome). The population in this study were students and alumni using non-probability sampling techniques. The results showed the percentage of the quality level of the context aspect 97.8%; input aspect 92.2%; process aspect 93.8%; product aspect 96.9%; and outcome aspect 97.2%; meaning that the UTK program of the Automotive Department of SMKN 1 Blitar is effective as a student competency test program.
References
Ajzen, I. (2015). Attitudes and Behavior: A Social Psychology Perspective. Routledge.
Bandura, A. (2017). Social Learning Theory. In Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
BNSP. (2017a). Badan NasionPeraturan Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi Nomor 1/BNSP/II/2017 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Sertifikasi Kompetensi bagi Lulusan SMK. BNSP.
BNSP. (2017b). Peraturan Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi Nomor 1/BNSP/II/2017 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Sertifikasi Kompetensi bagi Lulusan SMK.
BNSP. (2017c). Skema Sertifikasi KKNI Level II pada Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Kendaraan Ringan Otomotif.
Chen, H. T. (2015). Practical Program Evaluation: Theory-Driven Evaluation and the Integrated Evaluation Perspective. Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D. (2019). User acceptance of information technology: Systems, models, and theories. Routledge.
Donaldson, S. I. (2020). Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science: Strategies and Applications. Routledge.
Ernawati, E., Dewi, M., Rosalina, L., Ferdian, F., & Andres, F. S. (2023). An evaluation of e-learning of entrepreneurship course: Learning alternative during Covid-19 pandemic for university students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 47–58.
European Commission. (2022). Evaluation Standards and Guidelines. In European Commission. European Commission.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., & Sanders, J. R. (2018). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Guilford Press.
Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. Jossey-Bass.
Garcia, L. M., & Martinez, P. A. (2020). Enhancing Student Engagement Through Active Learning Strategies: The Role of Participation in Classroom Interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 99.
Garcia, Martinez, & Johnson. (2021). Social Change through Community Programs: An Impact Analysis. Social Change through Community Programs: An Impact Analysis. Community Development Journal, 47(3), 345–360.
Goodman, R. M., & Goodman, I. L. (2016). Goodman, Robert M.Evaluating Health Promotion Programs: An Outcomes-Based Approach.
Gullickson, A. R. (2020). Evaluation in Action: Interviews with Expert Evaluators. Sage Publications.
Johnson, H., & Miller, R. (2021). User satisfaction and product success: Exploring the connections. Springer.
Johnson, R. K., & Martinez, E. F. (2021). Behavior Change and Sustainable Impact: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Sustainable Development, 39(4), 512–527.
Jones, A. B. , & B. C. D. (2019). The Importance of Smooth Implementation in Achieving Desired Outcomes. Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 145–160.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Pengembangan Kurikulum Operasional di Satuan Pendidikan.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Uji Kompetensi Keahlian Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023. Kemendikbudristek.
Kemnaker. (2018). Keputusan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 97 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penetapan Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia Kategori Perdagangan Besar dan Eceran; Reparasi dan Perawatan Mobil, dan Sepeda Motor Golongan Pokok Perdagangan, Reparasi dan Perawatan Mobil dan Sepeda Motor Bidang Otomotif SubBidang Kendaraan Ringan Roda 4 (Empat).
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2018). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan.
Maulana, R. , & S. D. P. (2023). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(2), 101–112.
McDavid, J. C., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2019). Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: An Introduction to Practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Sage Publications.
Mertens, D. M. , & W. A. T. (2019). Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Guide. Guilford Press.
Misra, I., Sadikin, A., & Adlina, F. (2023). Evaluation of Bidikmisi scholarship program at state Islamic universities in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 26–36.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4th edition). SAGE Publications.
Pratama, B., & Hasanah, F. (2023). Evaluasi program sekolah berbasis inklusi menggunakan model CIPP. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 15(1), 45–56.
Rachmawati, A., & Suryadi, D. (2023). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(2), 123–134.
Rossi, Lipsey, & Freeman. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed). SAGE Publications.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.
Smith, & Brown. (2020). Attitude Change as a Catalyst for Behavior Change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55(1), 89–104.
Smith, C. D., Johnson, E. R., & Williams, A. B. (2017). Streamlining Implementation for Program Success. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 33(2), 178–192.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Peacock Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model. How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. The Guilford Press.
UNDP. (2021). Evaluation Guidelines. United Nations Development Programme.
Wang, X., & Baker, R. (2018). Content Interaction in Online Learning: A Comparative Study of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 893–912.
Willis, M. , et al. (2023). Stakeholder Theory, Public Engagement, and Epistemic Injustice. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
