Penguasaan Konsep Siswa dalam Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis Fenomena Disertai Penilaian Formatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v5i4.516Keywords:
Penguasaan konsep, argument driven inquiry, fenomena, penilaian formatif,Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendiskripsikan penguasaan konsep siswa dalam pembelajaran argument driven inquiry berbasis fenomena disertai penilaian formatif. Desain penelitian embedded experimental model dengan metode mixed methode. penelitian X IPA-1 di SMAN 1 Pademawu. Instrumen penelitian berupa 13 soal pilihan ganda beralasan. Data kuantitatif penelitian dianalisis dengan menggunakan t-paired test, N-gain, dan effect size. Data kualitatif berupa alasan dan hasil wawancara siswa. Hasil penilitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai effect size 2.88 (kuat) dan N-gain 0.33 (rendah). Siswa masih kesulitan dalam Hukum Newton pada soal C3, C4, dan C5 dimana banyak siswa menjawab benar namun tidak dapat memberikan alasan dengan benar.
References
Aviani, I., Erceg, N., Mešić, V., 2015. Drawing and using free body diagrams: Why it may be better not to decompose forces. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020137. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020137
Andriani, Y., 2016. Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Terpadu Di Smp Kelas Vii. Edusains 7, 114–120. Https://Doi.Org/10.15408/Es.V7i2.1578
Afwa, I. L., Sutopo., & Latifah, E. (2016). Deep Learning Question untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 434—447.
Anderson, T., Howe, C., Soden, R., Low, J., n.d.2001. Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students 2.
Amin, W. H., Darsikin, & Wahyono, U. 2015. Analisis Koherensi Konsep Hukum Newton Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Palu. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako, (Online), 3 (2): 40-45, (http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/EPFT/article/view/5113/4165).
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Alih bahasa: Agung Prihantoro. 2010. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 5, No.1(768307933). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Box, C. 2019. Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms: Changing the Landscape of Teaching and Learning. Switzerland: Sprinnger.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.
Docktor, J.L., Mestre, J.P., 2014. Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res. 10, 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high schoolphysics teachers, (November 2009), 1–26.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020110
Fazio, C., & Battaglia, O. R. (2018). Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Mechanics Through Cluster Analysis of FCI Student Answers.
Furtak, E. M. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. Shemwell, J. T. Ayala, C. C. Brandon, P. R. Shavelson, R. J. & Yin, Y. 2008. On the Fidelity of Implementing Embedded Formative Assessments and Its Relation to Student Learning. Applied Measurement in Education. 21: 360-389.
Furwati, S., Zubaidah, S., N.D. 2017. Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Hukum Newton Pada Siswa Smp Melalui Pembelajaran Multi Representasi 13.
Hasnunidah, Neni. (2016). Pengaruh Argument Driven Inquiry dengan Scaffolding terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Dasar Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Lampung. [Diadopsi dari Disertasi]. Univesitas Negeri Malang.
Hariyadi., Ibrohim., & Rahayu, S. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Lingkungan terhadap Keterampilan Proses dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA Siswa Kelas VII pada Materi Ekosistem. Jurnal Pendidikan:Teori, Penelitian, dan Pendidikan, 1(8), 1567—1574.
Harrison, C., 2015. Assessment For Learning In Science Classrooms 9.
Hudha, M. N., Yuliati, L., & Sutopo. (2016). Perubahan Konseptual Fisika dengan Authentic Problem melalui Integrative Learning pada Topik Gerak Lurus Pada SMA Suryabuana Malang. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 733—743. doi.org/10.21067/jip.v6i1.1078.
Jayanti, I. B. R., Wartono., & Sutopo. (2016). Dampak Program Resitasi terhadap Topik Hukum III Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 256—264.
Khiari, C. (2011). Newton’s laws of motion revisited: some epistemological and didactic problems. 5(1), 6.
Martín-Blas, T., Seidel, L., & Serrano-Fernández, A. 2010. Enhancing Force Concept Inventory diagnostics to identify dominant misconceptions in firstyear engineering physics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.497552.
Malichatin, H. 2013. Pengembangan Materi Subjek Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika. Journal of Innovative Science Education, (Online), 2 (1): 35-41, (http://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=CZyjE6oAAAAJ&hl=en).
Moyosore, O.A. 2015. The Effect of Formative Assessment on Students’ Achievement in Secondary School Mathematics. International Journal of Education and Research. 3 (10):481-490.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2012). Relations between representationalconsistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientificreasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1),1–10.
Nottis, K. E. K., Prince, M. J., & Vigeant, M. a. (2010). Building and understandingof heat transfer concepts in undergraduate chemical engineering courses. USChina Education Review, 7(2), 1–9.
Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., Amin, M., N.D. 2017. Penguasan Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Smp Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen 5.
Pyper, B. A. (2012). Changing scientific reasoning and conceptual understanding incollege students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413, 63–65.
Isaacs, T., at al. (Ed). 2013. Key Concepts. In Educational Assessment. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Rosenblatt, R., Heckler, A.F., 2011. Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 020112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020112
Sadler, D.R., 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr. Sci. 18, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sari, A., Sutopo., & Wartono. (2015). Penggunaan Multi Representasi Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa SMA Pada Materi Hukum II Newton. Seminar Nasional IPA VI Tahun 2015. 270-280. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/308962603
Saglam-Arslan, A., & Devecioglu, Y. (2010). Student teachers’ levels of understanding and model of understanding about Newton’s laws of motion. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1—20.
Shilla, R. A., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. 2017. Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Hukum Newton tentang Gerak. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 2, 257–263.
Sutopo, Liliasari, Waldrip, B., & Rusdiana, D. (2012). The Need of Representation Approach to Provide Prospective Physics Teacher with Better Reasoning Ability and Conceptual Understanding. Surabaya: 5Th International Seminar of Science Education.
Sutopo, & Waldrip, B. 2014. Impact of a Representational Approach on Students’ Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 741–766.
Susiana, N., Yuliati, L., & Latifah, E. (2018). Pengaruh Interactive Demonstration terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas X pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(3), 312—315.
Sari, A.L.R., Taufiq, A., n.d. 2018. Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulita105n9 Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton 8.
Silander, P. 2015. Digital Pedagogy. In P. Mattila, & P. Silander (Eds.), How to create the school of the future: Revolutionary thinking and design from Finland (pp. 9-26). Oulu: University of Oulu, Center for Internet Excellence.
Silander, P. 2015. Rubric for Phenomenon Based Learning. Retrieved October 5, 2016, from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-learning.html.
Smith, T.I., & Wittmann, M.C. 2007. Comparing Three Methods For Teaching Newton’s Third Law. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2): 020105-1 - 020105-8.
Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. 2016. Phenomenon-Based Teaching and Learning through the Pedagogical Lenses of Phenomenology: The Recent Curriculum Reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 31–47. Retrieved from http://forumoswiatowe.pl/index.php/czasopismo/article/view/458
Yin, Y., Tomita, M.K., Shavelson, R.J., 2014. Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 36, 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.787556
Zhou, S., Zhang, C., & Xiao, H. 2015. Student’s Understanding on Newton’s Third Law in Identifying the Reaction Force in Gravity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, (Online), 11 (3): 589-599, (http://www.ejmste.com).
