Perubahan Penguasaan Konsep Mekanika Newtonan Melalui Pembelajaran Collaborative Inquiry (CI) Berbasis Diagram Interaksi
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Angin, S. L., Sutopo, & Parno. 2017. Pemahaman Mahasiswa tentang Multi Representasi Konsep Percepatan. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 48-53.
Atasoy, B. 2009. The Effect of a Conceptual Change Approach on Understanding of Sudennts Chemical EquilibriumConcept. Journal Research and Science & Technologycal Education. 27: 267282.
Aufschnaiter, C. & Rogge C. 2010. Misconceptions or Missing Conception?. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science,&Technology Education. 6 (1): 318.
Arends, I. 2012. Learning to Teach Ninth Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Baser, M. 2006. Fostering Conceptual Change By Cognitive Conflict Based Instrustion On Students Understanding of Heat And Temperature Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2 (2): 96-114.
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. 2010. Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, tool, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349-377.
Brown, D.E. 1989. Students' concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton's third law. Physics Education, 24: 353- 358.
Clement, J. 1982. Student Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1): 66-71.
Cohen, dkk.2007 . Research Methods in Education Sixth Edition. Newyork, Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Creswell, J.W. 2012. Educational Research. Boston: Pearson.
Crook, C. 1991. Computers in the zone of proximal development: Implications for evaluation. Computers & Education, 17, 8191.
DeVellis, R.F. 2003. Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). California: Sage.
Dewey, J. 1910. Science as subject matter and as method. Science, 31, 121127.
Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Dillenbourg, P. 1999. What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 119). Oxford: Elsevier.
Docktor, J. L. & Mestre, J. P. 2014. Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topik Physics Education Research, 10, 020119.
Donohoo, J. 2011. Collaborative Inquiry: A Facilitators Guide. London: MISA.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. 1998. Learning in science: From behaviourisms towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 325). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Flores, S., Kanim, S.E., & Kautz, C.H. 2004. Student Use of Vector in Introductory Mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 72 (4): 460-468.
Gilbert, J.K., & Watts, D.M. 1983. Concepts, Misconceptions, and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Persepctives in Science Edication. Stud. Sci. Educ., 10: 61.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson R.E.. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition. Upper Saddle River , New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student.
Halloun, I. A., Hestenes, D. 1985. The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11): 1043-1055.
Hellingman, C. 1989. Do force have twin brothers?. Physics Education, 24: 36-40.
Hestenes, D. & Wells, M. 1992. A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30 (3):159166.
Heuvelen, A. V. & Zou, X. 2001. Multiple Representation of Work Energy Processes. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 69(2): 184-194.
Jimenez, J. V., & Perales, F. J. P. 2001. Graphic representational of force on secondary education: alaysis and alternative educational proposals. Physics Education, 36: 227-235.
Knight, R.D. 1995. The Vector Knowledge of Beginning Physics Student. Physics Teacher, 33: 74-78.
Mildenhall, P.T., & Williams, J.S. 2001. Instanbility in Student Use of Intuitive and Newtonian Models to Predict Motions: The Critical Effect of The Parameter Involved. International Journal of Science Education, 23: 643.
Morgan, G. A., Leech., N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. 2011. IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistic. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Nguyen, N.L., & Meltzer, D.E. 2003. Initial Understanding of Vector Concept Among Student in Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 71(6): 630-638.
Nunnally J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hil.
Ortiz, L.G., Heron, P.R.L., Shaffer, P.S, & McDermott L.C. 2001. Identifying Student Reasoning Difficulties With The Mathematical in Formalism Rotational Mechanics. AAPT Announcer, 31(4): 103.
Palmer, D.H. 1997. The Effect of Context on Student Reasoning About Forces. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6): 681.
Pilkington, R. M. 2004. Developing discussion for learning (Guest Editorial). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, Special Issue, 161164.
Pilkington, R. M., & Walker, S. A. 2003. Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instructional Science, 31(1&2), 4163.
Reif, F., Allen, S. 1992. Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts: A Study of Acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, 9(1): 1-44.
Robinson, J. P. Shaver, P. R.& Wrightsman, L. S. 1991. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.
Savinainen, A., Makynen, A., Nieminen, P., & Viiri, J. 2013. Does using a visual-representation tool foster students ability to identify forces and construct free-body diagrams?. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research. 9(1):1-11.
Shaffer, P. S., and McDermott, L. C. 2005. A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts. American Journal of Physics, 73(10): 921-931.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutopo. 2012. Pembelajaran Kinematika Berbasis Diagram Gerak: Cara Baru dalam Pembelajaran Kinematika. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA.
Sutopo. 2016. Students understanding of fundamental concept of mechanics wave. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(1): 41-53.
Taqwa, M. R. A. 2017. Profil pemahaman konsep mahasiswa dalam menentukan arah resultan gaya. Prosiding seminar nasional pendidikan sains PPs, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Faizah, R. 2016. Identifikasi kesulitan mahasiswa dalam penguasaan konsep kinematika. Prosiding seminar nasional pendidikan fisika, Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Taqwa, M. R. A., & Putra, G. S. 2017. Kajian efektifitas penggunaan model POE berintergrasi PhET pada topik kelistrikan. Prosiding seminar nasional pendidikan NANODIK, Universitas Muhammaddiyah Gresik.
Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo. 2017a. Recitation Program Based on Multi Representation Needed to Increasing The Kinematics Conceptual Understanding. The 2nd International Seminar on Science Education, Graduate School-Yogyakarta State University.
Taqwa, M. R. A., Hidayat, A., & Sutopo. 2017b. Konsistensi Pemahaman Konsep Kecepatan dalam Berbagai Format Representasi. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 31-39.
Yusuf, A. M. 2014. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan penelitian gabungan. Jakarta: Prenamedia Grup.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v5i1.443
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar