Kemampuan Multirepresentasi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran APBL (Authentic Problem Based Learning) Pada Materi Elastisitas dan Getaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v4i1.273Keywords:
multirepresentasi, authentic problem based learningAbstract
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif tipe fenomenologi yang bertujuan mendeskripsikan perkembangan kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa dalam pembelajaran aPBL. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI SMA. Data penelitian dianalisis secara secara kualitatif dengan mendeskripsikan temuan secara tekstual, grafik, dan tabel. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa yang menonjol adalah kemampuan multirepresentasi matematis dan yang kurang adalah kemampuan multirepresentasi verbal. Dari kuesioner respon siswa, siswa paling menyukai format soal bergambar dan menyelesaikan permasalahan dengan mengilustrasikan jawaban.References
Heron, P dan Meltzer, D. 2005. Guest Editorial, The future of physics education research: Intellectual challenges and practical concerns. Am. J. Phys., (Online), 73, 390, (http://ajp.aapt.org), diakses 7 April 2013.
Hegde, B. dan Meera, B. N.. 2012. How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., (Online) 8, 010109, (http://prst-per.aps.org), diakses 18 Maret 2013.
Kim, E dan S. J. Pak, S. J. 2001. Students do not overcome conceptual difï¬culties after solving 1000 traditional problems. Am. J. Phys., (Online), 70, 759, (http://ajp.aapt.org), diakses 7 April 2013.
Mazur, E. 1992. Qualitative vs. quantitative thinking: Are we teaching the right thing?. Opt. Photonics News, (Online), 3,38, (http://www.osa-opn.org), diakses 7 April 2013.
Mazur, E. 1997. Peer instruction—A user’s manual. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Redish, E. 2005. Changing student ways of knowing: What should our students learn in a physics class? In Proceedings of World View on Physics Education 2005: Focusing on Change, New Delhi. Singapura: World Scientiï¬c Publishing Co, (Online), (http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/papers/redish/IndiaPlen.pdf), diakses 21 Maret 2013.
Ibrahim, B. dan Rebello, S. N.. 2012. Representasional Task Formats and Problem Solving Strategies in Kinematics and Work. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., (Online) 8, 010126, (http://prst-per.aps.org), diakses 2 Februari 2013.
Van H. A. 1991. Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. Am. J. Phys., (Online) 59, 891, (http://ajp.aapt.org), diakses 7 April 2013.
Kohl, P. B. dan Finkelstein, N. D. 2008. Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res., (Online), 4, 010111, (http://prst-per.aps.org), diakses 18 Maret 2013.
Kozma, R. B. dan Russell, J. 1997. Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena. J. Res. Sci. Teach., (Online), 34, 949, (http://narst.org/publications/jrst.cfm), diakses 6 April 2013.
Heuvelen A. V. dan Zou, X. 2001. Multiple representations of work energy processes. Am. J. Phys., (Online), 69, 184, (http://ajp.aapt.org), diakses 7 April 2013.
Barrows, H. S. dan Neo, W. K.. 2007. Principle and Practice of aPBL. Singapura: Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd.
Hake, R.R. 2007. Design-Based Research in Physics Education Research: A Review. A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh, & J.Y. Baek, eds. (in press). Handbook of Design Research Methods in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. Erlbaum: (online) (http://www.physics.indiana.edu), diakses 7 April 2013.
