Profil Komunikasi Matematis Tulis Mahasiswa Tahun Pertama Perkuliahan Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Differensial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v9i3.1529Keywords:
Commognitive, first year students, mathematical communication, differential problemsAbstract
This research aims to describe the mathematical communication profile of first year students studying differential material. The research method begins with preparation, data collection, transcription and analysis. A total of 10 students were given math problem sheets, containing contextual story problems consisting of one number regarding differentials. A student was selected as a research subject based on Polya indicators and was interviewed in a semi-structured and in-depth manner to dig up further information and then analyzed using a cognitive lens. The research results show that the research subjects can solve mathematical problems well. The subject can communicate ordinary sentences well into mathematical sentences. The components of words use, visual mediators, narratives, and routines show that students' written mathematical communication skills are very good in solving differential problems.
References
Ayala, J. C., & Manzano, G. (2018). Academic performance of first-year university students: the influence of resilience and engagement. Higher Education Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1502258
Cresswel, J. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In Research design. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153
Ellis, R. A., & Bliuc, A. M. (2016). An exploration into first-year university students’ approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12385
Emanuel, E. P. L., Meidiana, Y. G., & Suhartono. (2021). Studi Komparasi Penggunaan Google Meet Dan Whatsapp Group Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Hangtuah 4 Surabaya. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 6(4), 849–853.
Emanuel, E. P. L., & Meilantifa. (2022). Dimanakah Nilai Ekstrim Fungsi Kuadrat Ditinjau dari Lensa Commognitive ? BRILIANT Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 7(54), 269–279.
Fajriyah, E., Mulyono, & Asikin, M. (2019). Mathematical Literacy Ability Reviewed from Cognitive Style of Students on Double Loop Problem Solving Model with RME Approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 57–64. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/26959
Gunnell, K. E., Mosewich, A. D., McEwen, C. E., Eklund, R. C., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2017). Don’t be so hard on yourself! Changes in self-compassion during the first year of university are associated with changes in well-being. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.032
Kim, D.-J., Choi, S., Lim, W., Thoma, A., Nardi, E., Viirman, O., … Sfard, A. (2019). Discourses of Functions – University Mathematics Teaching Through a Commognitive Lens. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
López, B. G., Cerveró, G. A., Rodríguez, J. M. S., Félix, E. G., & Esteban, P. R. G. (2013). Learning styles and approaches to learning in excellent and average first-year university students. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0170-1
McCarthy, J. (2016). Reflections on a flipped classroom in first year higher education. Issues in Educational Research.
Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Muksar, M. (2020). Textual and contextual commognitive conflict students in solving an improper fraction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.678528
Putut, E., Emanuel, L., & Anam, F. (2022). Sebuah Tinjauan Commognitive : Apakah Matriks Singular ? 7(54), 922–930. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v7i4.1073
Putut, E., Emanuel, L., Nusantara, T., Rahman, A., & Rahardi, R. (2023). Why am I confused ? Commognitive Conflict in Non-ordinary Question About Number Division. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(5s), 891–901. Retrieved from https://jrtdd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/644
Roberts, A., & le Roux, K. (2018). A commognitive perspective on Grade 8 and Grade 9 learner thinking about linear equations. Pythagoras. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v40i1.438
Thoma, A., & Nardi, E. (2018). Transition from School to University Mathematics: Manifestations of Unresolved Commognitive Conflict in First Year Students’ Examination Scripts. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0064-3
Trautwein, C., & Bosse, E. (2017). The first year in higher education—critical requirements from the student perspective. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0098-5
Tuset, G. A. (2018). A commognitive lens to study pre-service teachers ’ teaching in the context of achieving a goal of ambitious mathematics teaching. Proceeding, Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2019). Patterns of success: first-year student success in multiple domains. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1493097
van Herpen, S. G. A., Meeuwisse, M., Hofman, W. H. A., Severiens, S. E., & Arends, L. R. (2017). Early predictors of first-year academic success at university: pre-university effort, pre-university self-efficacy, and pre-university reasons for attending university. Educational Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1301261
Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers’ pedagogical discourse: a commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206
Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2013). Meta-rules of discursive practice in mathematics classrooms from Seoul, Shanghai and Tokyo. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0442-x
ZAYYADİ, M. (2020). Content and Pedagogical Knowledge of Prospective Teachers in Mathematics Learning: Commognitive Framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131
Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A commognitive framework: The process of solving mathematical problems of middle school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
